Skip to main content

Notes on class field theory

Section 7.5 Local-global compatibility

Reference.

[38] VI.5.
So far, we’ve used abstract class field theory to construct reciprocity isomorphisms (Theorem 7.3.8) and to establish the adelic form of the existence theorem (Theorem 7.4.8).
It remains to verify that the “abstract” reciprocity map coincides with the product of the local reciprocity maps (Definition 6.4.6). As noted earlier, this is enough to recover the classical Artin reciprocity law (Proposition 6.4.9); this will finally complete the proof of all of the statements originally asserted in Chapter 2).

Subsection Compatibility for cyclotomic extensions

Definition 7.5.1.

Let L/K be a Galois extension of number fields. Let
rL/K:IKGal(L/K)ab
be the product of the local reciprocity maps Definition 6.4.6. Meanwhile, let
rL/K:IKGal(L/K)ab
be the map obtained by inverting the isomorphism Gal(L/K)abCK/NormL/KCL given by Theorem 7.3.8.
As a base case for our work, we need to know that rL/K=rL/K when L is contained in a small cyclotomic extension. Note that this is very similar to the proof that the map v is an abstract henselian valuation (Lemma 7.3.6).

Proof.

In the setting of abstract class field theory, L/K is viewed as an “unramified” extension. Consequently, the reciprocity map rL/K:CK/NormL/KCLGal(L/K) is described completely by Lemma 5.3.1: it is given by composing the valuation map vK:CKZ^ with the inverse of the map dK:Gal(Ksmcy/K)Z^, then projecting from Gal(Ksmcy/K) to Gal(L/K). (Note that as per Remark 7.3.11, this does not depend on the artificial choice of the isomorphism dK, because vK is defined using the same choice.) Consequently, in this case we end up with the usual Artin map for a cyclotomic extension (Definition 1.1.7), which is compatible with local reciprocity by direct calculation (Example 4.1.4).

Subsection Compatibility for general extensions

Proof.

In the setting of abstract class field theory, L/K is viewed as a “totally ramified” extension. Consequently, we may set notation as in the proof of Lemma 5.3.2, then apply Proposition 5.2.7 to obtain a commutative diagram
Figure 7.5.4.
in which the horizontal arrows are isomorphisms (Theorem 7.3.8) and the right vertical arrow is an isomorphism, as then is the left vertical arrow. We also have a corresponding diagram on the local side:
Figure 7.5.5.
This means that we can reduce checking the compatibility for L/K to the corresponding statement for the “unramified” extension N/M, to which Lemma 7.5.2 applies.
At last, we obtain the desired compatibility of reciprocity maps, and with it the completion of the proofs from global class field theory. Hooray! (See Remark 7.6.17 for another approach.)

Proof.

By the norm limitation theorem (Theorem 7.3.10), we may assume that L/K is abelian. By Proposition 5.2.7, we may check the comparison of maps after replacing L with a larger abelian extension of K.
We may split the exact sequence
1Gal(Kab/Ksmcy)Gal(Kab/K)Gal(Ksmcy/K)Z^1
by choosing an element of Gal(Kab/K) lifting the generator 1Z^. Using this, we can split Kab as the compositum of Ksmcy and an abelian extension which is linearly disjoint from Ksmcy. Using the previous paragraph, we can split some finite extension of L as the compositum of linearly disjoint cyclic extensions, one contained in Ksmcy and the others linearly disjoint from Ksmcy. Applying Lemma 7.5.2 to the first extension and Lemma 7.5.3 to the others, we deduce the desired compatibility for abelian extensions.

Remark 7.5.7.

It’s worth repeating that only now do we know that the product rL/K of the local reciprocity maps kills principal idèles (Proposition 6.4.7). That fact, which relates local behavior for different primes in a highly global fashion, is the basis of various higher reciprocity laws. See [37], Chapter VIII for details.

Subsection Globalization of local abelian extensions

As a complement to Proposition 7.5.6, we show that every local abelian extension is the completion of a global abelian extension. Over Q, this holds because the local Kronecker-Weber theorem (Theorem 1.3.4) and the Kronecker-Weber theorem (Theorem 1.1.2) are expressed in terms of the same family of extensions of Q, namely the cyclotomic extensions; however, in the general case we must take a less explicit approach.

Proof.

We can quickly dispatch the cases where v is infinite: if v is complex there is nothing to prove, and if v is real then we may take L=K(1). So assume hereafter that v is finite.
By the existence theorem (Theorem 7.4.8) plus local-to-global compatibility (Proposition 7.5.6), it suffices to produce an open subgroup V of CK of finite index such that the preimage of V under KvCK is contained in N=NormM/KvM. Let S be the set of infinite places and let T=S{v}. By Corollary 6.2.11, oK,T is a finitely generated abelian group and G=oK,TN is a subgroup of oK,T of finite index.
Pick a finite place uT. The image of oK,T in Ku is a finitely generated subgroup of oKu. Hence we can choose a sufficiently small neighborhood U of the identity in oKu so as to ensure that UoK,TG.
Now put
W=N×U×wSKw×wS{u,v}oK,V=KW/K.
If αvKv maps into U, then there exists βK such that αvβW. On one hand, this implies that αvβvN. On the other hand, it implies that βoK,T and βuU, so βG and so βvN. Thus αvN, as desired.

Exercises Exercises

1.

Prove that Theorem 7.5.8 can be formally promoted to the conclusion that Lw=M.
Hint.
Since L/K is abelian, the kernel of the map Gal(Lw/Kv)Gal(M/Kv) is normal in Gal(L/K); take its fixed field.